
|
|
 2005 Initiative Update
Initiative Update as of February 25, 2005
Changes since the last
update:
- 1078. (SA05RF0003)
District Boundary Changes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
ADDED to Initiatives in Circulation.
- 1079. (SA05RF0004)
Changing District Boundaries. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
ADDED to Initiatives in Circulation.
- 1080. (SA05RF0005)
Reapportioning District Boundaries. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
ADDED to Initiatives in Circulation.
- 1081. (SA05RF0006)
Reapportionment of Districts. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
ADDED to Initiatives in Circulation.
Changes since the Feburary 23, 2005 update
are marked with the
button below.
Past
Updates:
02/23/05
02/18/05
02/14/05
02/09/05
02/03/05
01/27/05
01/26/05
|
The full texts of the
initiatives listed on this page are available on the Attorney
General's website at http://www.caag.state.ca.us/initiatives/activeindex.htm.
The complete Ballot
Pamphlets for current and previous elections are online. They include
the full text of the ballot propositions.
University of California Hastings College of the Law maintains a comprehensive,
searchable database of information on California ballot initiatives from 1911 to the
present. The database contains the full text of the initiatives, accompanying material
relating to their filing & qualification, related legal and legislative history, and
digital images of pertinent documents.
To go to the California Ballot Initiatives Database, click the link below:
University of California Hastings College of the Law also maintains a comprehensive,
searchable database of California ballot measures from 1911 to the present. The
Hastings site also offers PDF versions of ballot pamphlets from 1911 to the present.
To go to the California Ballot Propositions Database, click the link below:
Ballot measures that have qualified for the November 2, 2004, General Election ballots are
listed below. In addition, you will find a list of initiatives that are currently
circulating for possible placement on the next ballot.
California uses the
direct initiative process, which enables voters to bypass the
Legislature and have an issue of concern put directly on the ballot
for voter approval or rejection. There are two types of initiatives
that can be placed on the ballot: 1) statute revision, which
requires signatures equal to five percent of the total votes cast
for Governor in the preceding gubernatorial election, and 2)
constitutional amendment, which requires signatures equal to
eight percent of the Governor's total vote in the preceding
gubernatorial election.
As new initiatives
enter circulation or qualify for an election ballot, the Secretary
of State's office will issue initiative status updates.
Contact the
Elections Division at (916) 657-2166 for further
information.
(Top of
Page)
Top| Qualified for 2006 Primary| Qualified for 2006 General|Pending|Circulating| Attorney General
Propositions that are on the
June 6, 2006, Primary Election Ballot
Bond Measure
SB 1161 (Chapter 698, 2004). Alpert.
California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation
Bond Act of 2006.
Top| Qualified for 2006 Primary| Qualified for 2006 General|Pending|Circulating| Attorney General
Propositions that are on the
November 7, 2006, General Election Ballot
Bond Measure
SB 1856 (Chapter 697, 2002). Costa.
Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century.*
*Note: The Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act
for the 21st Century was originally scheduled to appear on the November 2, 2004, General
Election ballot. However, subsequent legislation (Senate Bill 1169, Chapter 71,
Statutes of 2004) provides for the submission of this Act to the voters on the November
7, 2006, General Election ballot instead.
Top| Qualified for 2006 Primary| Qualified for 2006 General| Pending|Circulating| Attorney General
Initiatives Pending Signature Verification
None
Top| Qualified for 2006 Primary| Qualified for 2006 General| Pending|Circulating| Attorney General
Initiatives in circulation
as of February 25, 2005
1066. (SA04RF0028)
State Legislature. Length of Session. Initiative Constitutional
Amendment.
Summary Date: 10/06/04
Circulation Deadline: 03/07/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponent: Edward J. "Ted" Costa (916) 482-6175
Provides that State Legislature shall convene regular session on first Monday in December
of even-numbered years solely to organize; shall reconvene on first business day of January
each year; shall not meet in regular session after June 30 of each year; and shall not meet
for total of more than 90 days during any two-year session. Legislature may reconvene for
additional 15 days to reconsider vetoed bills. Prohibits committee meetings and hearings
except when Legislature meets. Limits reimbursement of members for travel and living expenses
to actual days attending session. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of
Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would have the
following major fiscal impact: Unknown impact on legislative expenses, with potential savings
of millions of dollars for each two-year session. Actual fiscal impact would depend on future
actions of the Legislature and the Governor.
1067. (SA04RF0030, Amdt. #1-S) [REVISED]
Termination of Minor's Pregnancy. Waiting Period and Parental Notification.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 11/15/04
Circulation Deadline: 04/14/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponents: Paul E. Laubacher and Barbara R. Laubacher (916) 381-5222
Amends California Constitution to bar abortion on unemancipated minor until 48 hours after
physician notifies minor's parent/legal guardian, except in medical emergency or with parental
waiver. Permits judicial waiver of notice based on clear and convincing evidence of minor's
maturity or minor's best interests. Physician must report abortions performed on minors and
State shall compile statistics. Authorizes monetary damages for violation. Minor must
consent to abortion unless mentally incapable or in medical emergency. Permits judicial
relief if minor's consent to abortion is coerced. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst
and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: The net costs of
this measure to Medi-Cal and other programs are unknown, but are probably not significant in
the context of the total expenditures for these programs.
1068. (SA04RF0031)
Redistricting. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 11/30/04
Circulation Deadline: 04/29/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponent: Edward J. "Ted" Costa (916) 482-6175
Amends state constitutional provisions governing redistricting of California's Senate,
Assembly, Congressional and Board of Equalization districts. Requires panel of three retired
judges, selected by legislative leaders, to adopt new redistricting plan if this measure
passes and again after each national census. Panel must consider legislative and voter
proposals and hold public hearings. Redistricting plan effective upon unanimous adoption by
judges' panel and filing with Secretary of State. If plan subsequently disapproved by voters,
process repeats. Specifies time for judicial review of adopted redistricting plan; if plan
fails to conform to requirements, court may order new plan. Summary of estimate by
Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments:
One-time state redistricting costs, probably totaling a few million dollars, with comparable
savings for each redistricting effort after 2010 (once every ten years). These costs and
savings would be accommodated within the Legislature's existing spending limit.
1069. (SA04RF0032)
Vote Requirement for Fees/Charges. State and Local Appropriation
Limits. School Funding. State Mandates. Bonds. Initiative Constitutional
Amendment.
Summary Date: 12/22/04
Circulation Deadline: 05/23/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponents: John Campbell, Jon Coupal, Larry McCarthy (916) 443-6703
Requires certain state fees/charges be enacted by two-thirds vote of Legislature, not by
current majority vote. Requires certain local fees/charges be approved by two-thirds of
electorate; currently no vote required. Amends state and local appropriation limits.
Provides procedure if state exceeds appropriation limit. Repeals Proposition 98 revenue
transfers above appropriation limit to community college and school districts. Allocates General
Fund revenue above appropriation limit to specific funds/purposes. Specifies requirements for
reimbursement of local government mandates. Restricts state bond issuances. Summary of estimate
by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments:
Potential substantial reduction in state spending beginning in 2006-07. State spending restrained
below current-law levels in future years. Potential reduction in certain state and local revenues.
1070. (SA04RF0033)
Public Schools. Restrictions on Sex-Related Instruction.
Initiative Statute.
Summary Date: 01/04/05
Circulation Deadline: 06/03/05 Signatures Required: 373,816
Proponent: Tony Andrade (916) 230-2123
Prohibits public elementary school instruction on specified sex-related subjects.
Requires daily advance written parental notification and approval for every day of such
instruction in grades 7 through 12. Exceptions for students 18 years of age, for federally
approved disease-prevention instruction and student requests for confidential counseling with
school psychologist or peace officer. Specifies content and format of notice, including parents'
rights, description of information to be taught and materials or sources to be used. Provides
school district liability of $5,000 per violation plus attorney's fees and court costs. Summary of
estimate by the Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local
governments: Additional costs to school districts from parent notification regarding sex education
topics, potentially in the low millions of dollars annually.
1071. (SA04RF0034)
Waiting Period and Parental Notification Prior to Termination of
Minor's Pregnancy. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 01/19/05
Circulation Deadline: 06/20/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponents: Kristen Edwards and Rosemarie Avila, c/o Mark Bucher, Esq. (714) 573-2201
Amends California Constitution's right to privacy by prohibiting an abortion on an
unemancipated minor until 48 hours after physician notifies minor's parent or legal guardian,
except in medical emergency or with parental waiver of notice. Permits judicial waiver of notice
based on clear and convincing evidence that minor is sufficiently mature and well-informed to
decide whether to have an abortion or that parental notification is not in the minor's best
interests. Authorizes parent or guardian to obtain actual damages, or statutory damages of
$10,000, for violation. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of
fiscal impact on state and local governments: The net costs of this measure to Medi-Cal and other
programs are unknown, but are probably not significant in the context of the total expenditures
for these programs.
1072. (SA04RF0037, Amdt. #1-NS)
Reapportionment. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/03/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/05/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponents: Edward J. (Ted) Costa, Dr. Arthur Laffer, Major General Sidney S. Novaresi (USAF) Ret., Jimmie Johnson (916) 482-6175
Amends state Constitution’s process for redistricting California’s Senate, Assembly, Congressional and Board of Equalization districts. Requires three-member panel of retired judges, selected by legislative leaders, to adopt new redistricting plan if measure passes and again after each national census. Panel must consider legislative, public proposals/comments and hold public hearings. Redistricting plan becomes effective immediately when adopted by judges’ panel and filed with Secretary of State. If voters subsequently reject redistricting plan, process repeats. Specifies time for judicial review of adopted redistricting plan; if plan fails to conform to requirements, court may order new plan. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would have the following major fiscal impact: One-time state redistricting costs, probably totaling a few million dollars. Comparable savings for each redistricting effort after 2010 (once every ten years).
1073. (SA04RF0035)
Economic Development Banks. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/07/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/07/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponent: David K. Johnson
Authorizes creation of private companies as Economic Development Banks owned by natural-born
U.S. citizens. Authorizes Banks to accept time deposits only, finance and invest in California economic development, and assist specified business, social and racial groups. Allows California residents to open tax-free, individual Bank accounts. Bars California government from limiting Bank investments or imposing assessments or zoning restrictions. Allows Banks to condemn land for specified purposes. Prohibits businesses from closing or shifting production from designated facilities. Limits state and local governments' regulation of American companies, American-made products or “big box enterprises.” Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Reduced bank-related state income tax revenues potentially totaling in the tens of millions of dollars annually. This revenue loss could be partially offset by increased state and local tax revenues from new economic activity.
1074. (SA04RF0036)
California Petroleum Commission. Initiative Statute.
Summary Date: 02/07/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/07/05 Signatures Required: 373,816
Proponent: Celes King, IV
Creates seven member Commission to regulate privately owned petroleum companies, whether
publicly traded or privately held. Three commissioners appointed by Governor; remainder elected.
Commission shall: establish maximum rates for petroleum fuels sold in California; license
petroleum producers/facilities; set license fee; determine need for additional facilities and
may order their construction as condition of license renewal; determine whether petroleum
facilities may be abandoned/sold; limits cumulative profits of producers/facilities to 5% above
costs; promote use of petroleum alternatives; provide consumer complaint forum; adopt regulations;
establish/collect civil penalties; refer criminal violations to district attorney. Summary of
estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local
governments: This measure could potentially result in annual state costs of up to $40 million
for regulatory, planning and other activities of the Commission, partially offset by fee revenues;
its net fiscal impact is unknown, but could result in reductions in state and local revenues to
the extent that petroleum price regulation results in decreases in profits and possibly petroleum
availability, investment and economic activity generally. These reductions would be potentially
offset, to an unknown extent, by revenue increases resulting from increased economic activity
generated by lower retail petroleum prices to consumers.
1075. (SA04RF0038)
Car Dealers. Buyers' Right To Cancel Purchase. Seller Disclosures. Initiative Statute.
Summary Date: 02/18/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/18/05 Signatures Required: 373,816
Proponents: Roberta B. Johansen and James C. Harrison (510) 346-6200
Allows buyer of used automobile to return automobile to dealer, cancel purchase within three
business days and receive full refund, less reasonable mileage offset. Requires that dealers
disclose credit scores. Limits dealer loan fees to $150; prohibits dealers from accepting
additional compensation from certain lenders. Requires dealers to disclose monthly cost of
financing optional items. Prohibits advertising or selling used vehicles as "certified,"
except in limited circumstances. Prohibits sale of vehicles failing smog standards. Increases
discretionary penalties in warranty or advertising lawsuit filed by or for members of military.
Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and
local governments: This measure would have the following major fiscal effect: Various possible
impacts on state and local government revenues resulting from changes in the financing of vehicle
sales. The net fiscal impact of these changes is unknown.
1076. (SA05RF0001)
Public Service Contracts With Private Parties. Initiative
Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/23/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/25/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponents: Tony Strickland and Shawn Steel (877) 449-2700
Authorizes governmental entities, including cities, counties, school districts and regional
agencies, to contract with private entities and individuals for public services, except police
and fire protection, if the governing body determines, in its sole discretion, that the public
interest would be better served by contracting with the private sector. Allows the continuance
of existing private contracts for police and fire protection services. Summary of estimate by
Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Unknown
fiscal effect, with potential net savings to state and local governments due to increased
options for providing public services.
1077. (SA05RF0002)
State Government Reorganization Plans. Legislative Vote Requirement.
Initiative Statute.
Summary Date: 02/23/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/25/05 Signatures Required: 373,816
Proponent: Joel Fox (916) 325-0170
Amends state law to require a two-thirds vote in both houses of the Legislature, rather than
the current requirement of a simple majority vote in either house, in order for the Legislature
to reject a state government reorganization plan proposed by the Governor. Makes related findings
and declarations. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal
impact on state and local governments: This measure would have the following major fiscal impact:
Unknown impact on state administrative costs. Fiscal impact would depend on future reorganization
plans submitted by the Governor and on the actions of future Legislatures.
1078. (SA05RF0003)
District Boundary Changes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/25/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/25/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponent: Robert W. Harris (916) 449-6190
Amends State Constitution's redistricting process. Four-member panel of retired judges,
selected by legislative leaders, will adjust boundaries of Senate, Assembly, and Board of
Equalization districts; Legislature will adjust Congressional district boundaries.
Panel to adopt redistricting plan when measure passes and again after each national census.
Panel must consider legislative and public proposals/comments and hold public hearings.
If panel unanimously approves redistricting plan, it becomes effective immediately when filed
with Secretary of State; if panel fails to unanimously approve redistricting plan, Legislature
adjusts Senate, Assembly, and Board of Equalization districts. Summary of estimate by Legislative
Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure
would have the following major fiscal impact: One-time state redistricting costs, probably
totaling a few million dollars.
1079. (SA05RF0004)
Changing District Boundaries. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/25/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/25/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponent: Robert W. Harris (916) 449-6190
Amends State Constitution's redistricting process. Three-member panel of retired judges,
selected by legislative leaders, will adjust boundaries of Senate, Assembly, and Board of
Equalization districts; Legislature will adjust Congressional district boundaries. Panel to adopt
redistricting plan when measure passes and again after each national census. Panel must consider
legislative and public proposals/comments and hold public hearings. Panel's redistricting plan
subject to voter approval. If panel fails to unanimously approve proposed redistricting plan, or
if voters reject plan, the Legislature adjusts Senate, Assembly, and Board of Equalization
districts. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on
state and local governments: This measure would have the following major fiscal impact: One-time
state redistricting costs, probably totaling a few million dollars.
1080. (SA05RF0005)
Reapportioning District Boundaries. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/25/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/25/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponent: Robert W. Harris (916) 449-6190
Amends State Constitution's redistricting process. Four-member panel of retired judges,
selected by legislative leaders, will adjust boundaries of Senate, Assembly, and Board of
Equalization districts; Legislature will adjust Congressional district boundaries. Panel to adopt
redistricting plan when measure passes and again after each national census. Panel must consider
legislative and public proposals/comments and hold public hearings. Panel's redistricting plan
subject to voter approval. If panel fails to unanimously approve proposed redistricting plan, or
if voters reject plan, the Legislature adjusts Senate, Assembly and Board of Equalization
districts. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on
state and local governments: This measure would have the following major fiscal impact: One-time
state redistricting costs, probably totaling a few million dollars.
1081. (SA05RF0006)
Reapportionment of Districts. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/25/05
Circulation Deadline: 07/25/05 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponent: Robert W. Harris (916) 449-6190
Amends State Constitution's process for redistricting California's Senate, Assembly,
Congressional and Board of Equalization districts. After each national census, the Legislature
shall appoint a bipartisan advisory committee composed of non-State legislators, with equal
representation from the State's two largest political parties, to produce a redistricting plan for
consideration and deliberation by the Legislature. Specifies the criteria that shall be used for
drawing district boundaries. Summary of estimate by Legislative analyst and Director of Finance of
fiscal impact on state and local governments: The measure would likely have no significant fiscal
impact.
Top| Qualified for 2006 Primary| Qualified for 2006 General| Pending|Circulating| Attorney General
Initiatives pending with the Attorney General
as of February 25, 2005
The list below reflects those proposed measures that have been
submitted to the Attorney General for preparation of the title and
summary that will appear on the initiative petitions. This process
takes approximately 60 days; however, if amendments are submitted
by the proponent the time period is lengthened. When the official
summary is complete, the Attorney General forwards it to the
proponent and to the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State
then provides calendar deadlines to the proponent and to the county
elections officials.
Top| Qualified for 2006 Primary| Qualified for 2006 General| Pending|Circulating| Attorney General
Copyright ©2000 California Secretary of State. Privacy Statement
|